Comments on (02) 9063 0289

10.00%
Spam Score
0 complaints this year, 2 total complaints

0 complaints this year, 2 total complaints

Comments on (02) 9063 0289

Dave

Posted on June 1, 2020
Caller type: Unknown
Location: Australia
Caller: Easy Signs

This is a legitimate printing company called Easy Signs.
6 found this comment helpful
6

Anonymous

Posted on March 24, 2025
Caller type: Company
Location: Australia
Caller: (02) 9063 0289

I haven’t got a sign made by Easy Signs
1 found this comment helpful
1

Trish

Posted on December 8, 2021
Caller type: Unknown
Location: Australia
Caller: Easy Signs

Letting me know my order was ready for pick up
1 found this comment helpful
1

I Called Back

Posted on March 20, 2020
Caller type: Unknown
Location: Australia
Called back the number (02) 9063 0289 and reached vm but couldn't hear the name of the company
1 found this comment helpful
1

Anonymous

Posted on May 21, 2025
Caller type: Unknown
Location: Australia
They have rung at 6.39am in the morning whoever it is and no, I do not have any order with Easy Signs or anyone else.
0 found this comment helpful
0

bob

Posted on April 19, 2023
Caller type: Unsolicited call
Location: Australia
Caller: Easy Signs

Letting me know my order was ready for pick up. I suspect this is a ploy to make an unsolicited sales call.
0 found this comment helpful
0

Kate

Posted on March 8, 2023
Caller type: Company
Location: Australia
Caller: Easy Signs

This is a legitimate company and phone number.
0 found this comment helpful
0

No listing found for (02) 9063 0289. Do you have a comment?

2 people have commented on this number. Add yours so others know what to expect.

Not sure what to say? We'll write one for you:

For privacy, please avoid including names or personal details.

Your comment is anonymous. Every comment makes this page more useful for the next person who searches.

You've already commented on this number. Would you like to add another?

Do you have a comment about (02) 9063 0289?

Do you have a comment about (02) 9063 0289?